Which set of terms correctly defines physical confrontation in GO workplace violence?

• A. Verbal threats; intimidation
• B. Property damage; arson
• C. No physical contact defined in GO
• D. Unlawful touching of another; tactical/defensive stance; clenched fists

Answer: (D)

In GO workplace violence, physical confrontation is defined by actual or attempted physical contact and clear indicators of readiness to engage. The best set includes unlawful touching of another, a tactical or defensive stance, and clenched fists. Unlawful touching signals the presence of physical contact, while a tactical/defensive stance and clenched fists show preparation for or escalation toward a physical interaction. Verbal threats or intimidation describe non-physical behavior and don’t meet the definition of physical confrontation. Property damage or arson focus on damaging property rather than direct physical contact between people. And GO does define physical contact, so saying there’s no such definition would be incorrect.